Provisioning for more rack power using 240/415V Power Distribution - The literature I’ve been reading on 240/415V power distribution appears heavily tailored for new builds; are there other instances where 240/415V is applicable and will provide benefit
Yes.
Bringing higher AC voltages to the rack based equipment switching power supply modules has been a hot topic for more than a few years now. Selecting a power distribution system based on the maximum available power to the supply rated voltages on each device will maximize efficiency.
• Equipment will operate more efficiently using the highest supported voltage available.
An article from a few years ago; “Bringing 415VAC To the Cabinet Level “ leads us to recognize the value and indicates the greatest and quickest ROI is with new builds.
http://www.servertech.com/uploads/documents/0000/0561/Bringing415VACtoTheCabinetLevel_July2009Article.pdf
North American data center new builds utilizing the benefits by implementing 240 volts to the equipment within the rack continues at an increasing rate. However, other factors have also become drivers for implementation within present data centers. Increased power demands and provisioning for more power can be a key issue for a new or present data center installation.
For example, instances have come up where a row of racks within an existent data center had an increased power requirement for up to 17kW of continuous current redundant power. The increased power demand for these racks required increased voltage, current, or both to satisfy the requirement. The initial intent was to bring 3-Phase power and increased amperage to the rack. The implementation was to provide two power feeds (A & B) to the rack at 208V, 60A 3-Phase [208V x 60A x 1.732 x .8 = 17.3 kW, per power feed (Volts x Amps x square root of 3 due to line-to-line wiring x 80% maximum safety rating per NEC]. This would have provided a means to maintain an 80% safety rated maximum load of up to 17.3 kW should any one side (A or B) be required to carry the entire load. However, it became apparent that these equipment racks could not physically accommodate the larger, less pliable power cords and bulkier connectors required for the higher amperage rated power strip inlet cords. These racks also could not physically accommodate multiple lower amperage in-feeds ad required some innovative thinking. Further investigation uncovered a 240/415V solution once it was realized 277/480V power was available within the existent installed UPS system. With the addition of a smaller autotransformer, fully redundant 17kW power was provided using 240 volts AC to the equipment. This was provided using 240/415V power distribution with two power feeds (A & B) per rack [240V x 30A x 3 x .8 = 17.3 kW per power feed: Volts x Amps x 3 due to line-to-neutral wiring x 80% maximum safety rating per NEC]. Increasing the power by means of increased voltage without increasing the amperage (240/415V @30A) allowed use of rack based power strips utilizing smaller more pliable power inlet cords with reduced size connectors as compared to that of a higher amperage rated (208V @ 60A) power strip.
In conclusion, North American data centers implementing 240 volts to the end equipment AC power supplies continues at an increasing rate. The majority of the implementations are for new build outs that can easily show the greatest and quickest ROI for 240/415V power distribution. Some of the key points for 240/415V power distribution to the rack:
• Provides a means to increased rack Power densities.
• Equipment will operate more efficiently using the highest supported voltage available.
• Fewer branch circuits to the rack will reduce wiring, weight, & bulk.
• Less wiring bulk increases airflow and cooling efficiency.
Number of Power Feed Required Comparison to provide safety rated 17 kW
|
Volts
|
Amps
|
Phase
|
Safety Rated kW per
Power Feed
|
# of Power Feeds required for
17 kW
|
Total # of Power Feeds Required with Redundancy
|
NOTES
|
|
240
|
30
|
3
|
17.3
|
1
|
2
|
240 x 30 x 3 = 21.6kW
|
|
208
|
60
|
3
|
17.3
|
1
|
2
|
208 x 60 x 1.732 = 21.6kW
|
|
208
|
30
|
3
|
8.6
|
2
|
4
|
208 x 30 x 1.732 = 10.8kW
|
|
208
|
30
|
1
|
5.0
|
4
|
8
|
208 x 30 = 6.2kW
|
|
120
|
30
|
1
|
2.8
|
6
|
12
|
120 x 30 = 3.6kW
|
Recent Comments